From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 20 12:19:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DCE106566B for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 12:19:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A448FC1C for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 12:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o4KCJldg002733; Thu, 20 May 2010 19:19:48 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Message-ID: <4BF528E3.7020502@grosbein.pp.ru> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 19:19:47 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100511 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rihad References: <4BF4252F.8000208@mail.ru> <20100519190505.GA29133@rdtc.ru> <4BF4BBB2.8030806@mail.ru> <4BF4C676.8010709@grosbein.pp.ru> <4BF4D152.8030005@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <4BF4D152.8030005@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: increasing em(4) buffer sizes X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:19:51 -0000 On 20.05.2010 13:06, rihad wrote: >>>> Some more useful tunnables for loader.conf: >>>> >>>> dev.em.0.rx_int_delay=200 >>>> dev.em.0.tx_int_delay=200 >>>> dev.em.0.rx_abs_int_delay=200 >>>> dev.em.0.tx_abs_int_delay=200 >>>> dev.em.0.rx_processing_limit=-1 >>>> >>> So this interrupt delay is the much talked about interrupt moderation? >>> Thanks, I'll try them. Is there any risk the machine won't boot with >>> them if rebooted remotely? >> >> Yes, for hw.em.rxd/hw.em.txd only. em interfaces will not function >> if you set these two too high for your nic chip, so read man em >> and mentioned Intel document carefully. >> >> It's pretty safe to play with other tunnables. >> > Can I even set the mentioned dev.em.0.* settings on a live system > remotely? You seem to also have an em card, have you tried doing that? Yes, it is permitted.