Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 08:56:41 -0700 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: "Eric W. Bates" <ericx_lists@vineyard.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: showing esp tunnels in routing table Message-ID: <44FEEFB9.2060408@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <44FEE301.2090008@vineyard.net> References: <44FEDD18.8060506@vineyard.net> <20060906144002.GI30554@catpipe.net> <44FEE301.2090008@vineyard.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric W. Bates wrote: > > Phil Regnauld wrote: >> Eric W. Bates (ericx_lists) writes: >>> When you establish an esp tunnel, the subnets on the remote end of the >>> tunnel do not seem to appear in either "netstat -nr" or 'route get >>> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx' >>> >>> Is there a way to display those routes other than using setkey to dump >>> the SPD's? >> No, because there are no routes. The IPSec layer "hijacks" the packets >> and they are encapsulated before the routing table gets a chance >> to see them. >> >> You would have to setup transport ESP + gif/gre tunnels to see routing >> entries. > > Apparently, openbsd's implementation of netstat allows one to view ESP > 'flows' (I believe that is how they refer to them) by examining the > family 'encap' > > netstat -rnf encap > > We have no such equivalent? openbsd integrated the SAD w/ the routing table; something I've wanted to do forever. Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44FEEFB9.2060408>