From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 16 09:20:48 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589BF1065670;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:20:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9A48FC14;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:20:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.100])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA17663;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:20:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1RQbfg-0008Mx-Rh; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:20:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4EC3806A.6080901@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:20:42 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:8.0) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org>
	<CADLo83-_pt3zYv7--RZ-89uwP4utEfcedq4n0xSwZmAxuFuTCQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EC2A4FA.3010101@FreeBSD.org> <4EC371F5.1050008@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4EC371F5.1050008@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:20:48 -0000

on 16/11/2011 10:19 Doug Barton said the following:
> On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> It should be
>>
>> MASTER_SITES=		${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL}
>> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=	avg
> 
> Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the
> distfile mirror became the only working master site by default.

Umm, I am not sure I understand the reasoning here, so would appreciate an
explanation.  I agree that this is not a great improvement over the previous
status quo (except that it is now clear that the distfile is hosted by us on
purpose, not by accident).  But do you suggest that having <all freebsd mirrors
plus one site under avg's control (with unknown reliability characteristics)> is
much better than just <all freebsd mirrors> ?  Because it doesn't appear to be
that way to me.

Thank you.

-- 
Andriy Gapon