From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri May 18 20:19:29 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2899CEDA664; Fri, 18 May 2018 20:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.netplex.net", Issuer "RapidSSL RSA CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C968887DB6; Fri, 18 May 2018 20:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.15.1/8.15.1/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id w4IKJLeH000517; Fri, 18 May 2018 16:19:21 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.9]); Fri, 18 May 2018 16:19:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 16:19:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net Reply-To: Daniel Eischen To: Warner Losh cc: Steve Kargl , Andreas Nilsson , FreeBSD X11 mailing list , Current FreeBSD Subject: Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <3a5edc5c-3caa-830b-4bd9-53ff52feb8a7@freebsd.org> <20180518193009.GA88432@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 20:19:29 -0000 On Fri, 18 May 2018, Warner Losh wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Steve Kargl < > sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> Check the Makefiles >> >> % more /usr/ports/graphics/drm-next-kmod/Makefile >> >> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= amd64 >> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON= the new KMS components are only supported on amd64 >> >> Not to ia32 friendly. >> > > So do people use i386 for desktop? And need the latest KMS stuff? I can easily imagine an embedded x86 kiosk type appliance. Does basic xorg stuff work without drm? -- DE