From nobody Wed Nov 20 16:28:56 2024 X-Original-To: virtualization@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Xtmyc4w8Jz5dS8d for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Xtmyc3sNFz4Gwt for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1732120136; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TayOb1eGnq6iUoh+pMeGb0LKbtq3SICBM3QDwpvYtwY=; b=Nu/qgp/ab/SHEpPaqp53QvcbP42TLMwqj8p5JqGLxQ68Ptyd9SLOof6eLHDlle5FTDHCKg mY71J0sr4N+nMYxDK0stv6VTRaS8LTR064XyQDWHJwj1P2KbvR/cci9QHq8E1PyGcTqNCN cmIDJAPl60fLJyJY4fsaxuCUtaNB3r8IY0UbZN7l8r9FDnntofBMNbHDYhqFgEyFOChkr1 V945LUYA41N40GSYyNwUUrMPmOINhTXnMI1+IwrYTcXApdkrVV4YDMkxVfA57r/wU57jC7 pjxohk4Wj/l0TfURar7JuCS2R1vdLiHbFZXx0L7ZheyzCVYvmwCywMhSn+gLGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1732120136; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QK12uLME3qmEnJkKI88x+yQNJyvE6uG2lZ5bVPeGwezNC4Hm0XCQoKNnCKppsJ6vxVK9/W r8YSSgWc5QEnWdOUVVuRcEzV7puOOMEzfebmgoPg27oojcjmRQkYeuURIRyBCVObGcV73h 5bcVZE6HJRSpjQMuh3qyEVYHY71nPsQ6YygMc5gSA3/fTSLEA23k0/PCIp6M2gS+EcBbdx icmmw5GdsPm5S5yM+bar1fFP5bv3Obi07UaHC58yTtcYLeASv7FInTD/xkh+04G2Z7KVG1 O5kUhTZet+di6E9alqlGCo9UTsNac5EEnaLS4vTvOMgn4TK3NpeSS2wpHEqgIg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Xtmyc3MDKz128V for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4AKGSus3086075 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:28:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4AKGSu6V086072 for virtualization@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:28:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 282852] bhyve: Failed to emulate instruction sequence Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:28:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bhyve X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mp@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-virtualization List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D282852 --- Comment #4 from Mark Peek --- (In reply to Sean Farley from comment #2) > Is there a particular reason to choose the *_IMM flag? Good catch, yes, it should be VIE_OP_F_IMM8. I didn't apply the patch but d= id copy/paste/edit from the existing code. Feel free to commit since you have the right patch. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=