From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 4 03:32:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D442106566B for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 03:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel-lucent.com.au) Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFEA8FC16 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 03:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel-lucent.com.au) Received: from ihrh1.emsr.lucent.com (h135-1-218-53.lucent.com [135.1.218.53]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id n743Hv0d011614 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:17:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from insmb.au.alcatel-lucent.com (insmb.au.alcatel-lucent.com [139.188.42.184]) by ihrh1.emsr.lucent.com (8.13.8/emsr) with ESMTP id n743HtQP019116 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:17:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com (pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com [139.188.12.154]) by insmb.au.alcatel-lucent.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n743I0if001458 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:18:00 +1000 (EST) X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n743HrpG062094 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:17:53 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel-lucent.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost) by pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n743Hral062093 for ctm-users@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:17:53 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel-lucent.com.au) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:17:53 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090804031753.GP98247@pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <4A77A0EE.3060602@missouri.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uc35eWnScqDcQrv5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A77A0EE.3060602@missouri.edu> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39 Subject: Re: Do you still want CTM? X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:32:19 -0000 --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2009-Aug-03 21:46:06 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >My question is this - are there people who still depend on CTM for their= =20 >updates? Or is it time to close down CTM? Or is there someone else who= =20 >wants to take it over? I don't have CVSup access at work and currently rely on CTM delta emails. I also use CTM (via FTP) at home because that was easy to setup and means my trees at home and work are synchronised. I could switch to CVSup at home without too much hassle but loss of CTM would be a serious hassle at work - the easiest solution would probably be for me to setup something fairly similar to a CTM server at home and mail it to work. As for formally taking over CTM, I don't think I'm in a position to do so but would appreciate some more details: - How much disk space is required? - How resource intensive is building the deltas? If it's a dedicated box, what CPU/RAM does it have? - What are the bandwidth requirements? - How are the deltas forwarded out to the mail and FTP servers? --=20 Peter Jeremy --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkp3qGEACgkQ/opHv/APuIdvgACgj0bPnSMxOiycArX84cb87GSD XjkAn0uHEGelhQr2sUj3nXwR7s3njM15 =D0t8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5--