From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 25 13:05:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62F116A4CE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:05:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.farley.org (farley.org [67.64.95.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC5543D4C for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:05:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org) Received: from thor.farley.org (thor.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:290:1::5]) by mail.farley.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0PD5DZx088806; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:05:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.farley.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0PD5SdA011551; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:05:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:05:28 -0600 (CST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_C=2E_Farley?= To: delphij@delphij.net In-Reply-To: <1106656607.615.5.camel@spirit> Message-ID: <20050125070204.W10738@thor.farley.org> References: <1106656607.615.5.camel@spirit> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1528465624-1106658328=:10738" cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:05:37 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1528465624-1106658328=:10738 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Xin LI wrote: > Dear folks, > > A recent glance at OpenBSD indicates that they have an excellent > re-written of nc(1), also known as "netcat" that is very handy for > system administrators. The OpenBSD version of nc is licensed under > the BSD License. > > While there may be some concerns about the potential security affects > of it, I think it might be good if we have it in our base system, or > in ports. Although it is really old, there is a port (/usr/ports/net/obnc). It would be nice to have it in base since it is a good building block for scripts. Se=E1n --=20 sean-freebsd@farley.org --0-1528465624-1106658328=:10738--