Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:05:28 -0600 (CST)
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_C=2E_Farley?= <sean-freebsd@farley.org>
To:        delphij@delphij.net
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?
Message-ID:  <20050125070204.W10738@thor.farley.org>
In-Reply-To: <1106656607.615.5.camel@spirit>
References:  <1106656607.615.5.camel@spirit>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--0-1528465624-1106658328=:10738
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Xin LI wrote:

> Dear folks,
>
> A recent glance at OpenBSD indicates that they have an excellent
> re-written of nc(1), also known as "netcat" that is very handy for
> system administrators.  The OpenBSD version of nc is licensed under
> the BSD License.
>
> While there may be some concerns about the potential security affects
> of it, I think it might be good if we have it in our base system, or
> in ports.

Although it is really old, there is a port (/usr/ports/net/obnc).  It
would be nice to have it in base since it is a good building block for
scripts.

Se=E1n
--=20
sean-freebsd@farley.org
--0-1528465624-1106658328=:10738--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050125070204.W10738>