Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:55:03 -0500 From: Jim <rip@berk.com> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> Cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Support for secure http protocols Message-ID: <9712172155.AA03705@host.berk.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yeah, Stronghold is a modified version of Apache1.2.4
It costs a pretty penny for commercial use.
edu is free... I think they have a 30day evaluation.
It takes alot of the frills out of Apache as well as providing SSL support.
-Jim Palmer
At 11:07 AM 12/17/97 -0800, you wrote:
>Wes Peters writes:
>> So, my question is: if I have the capability (time, interest, etc) to
>> implement only ONE secure http transport, which one should it be? There
>> is a draft ieft standard for S-HTTP, but Netscape et al HTTP-SSL seems to
>> have garnered more support in the real world.
>
>I think SSL is more prevalent than SHTTP. Also, there already exists
>a version of Apache (called Stronghold I think) that includes SSL.
>
>-Archie
>
>___________________________________________________________________________
>Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9712172155.AA03705>