From owner-freebsd-www Thu Feb 27 02:50:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA18220 for www-outgoing; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 02:50:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA18214 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 02:50:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA11147; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 02:50:03 -0800 (PST) To: Doug White cc: "Joe \"Marcus\" Clarke" , webmaster@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: New ports In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 26 Feb 1997 19:48:14 PST." Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 02:50:03 -0800 Message-ID: <11143.857040603@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The ports tree changes too fast on a daily basis to flag the changes in > the www heirarchy (although our esteemed webmasters may have a different > opinion). I think a "what's new" page is definitely a reasonable thing, though making it for the ports collection alone might be less powerful than simply building an idea of "newness" into the web page build process itself. At the very end of the build, those files which were newer than the others would be assumed to be changed somehow and an special "what's new" index built as the very last thing done. Perhaps you could search for