From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec 20 10: 5: 6 2000
From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 20 10:05:04 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A8B37B402
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from billy-club.village.org (billy-club.village.org [10.0.0.3])
	by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBKI52s20091;
	Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:05:02 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@billy-club.village.org)
Received: from billy-club.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by billy-club.village.org (8.11.1/8.8.3) with ESMTP id eBKI5is41536; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:05:44 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <200012201805.eBKI5is41536@billy-club.village.org>
To: Makoto MATSUSHITA <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Why 'lnc.ko' instead of 'if_lnc.ko' ? 
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 21 Dec 2000 02:18:01 +0900."
		<20001221021801G.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> 
References: <20001221021801G.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>  
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:05:44 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: imp@billy-club.village.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <20001221021801G.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Makoto MATSUSHITA-san writes:
: However, this kernel module is named as 'lnc.ko'. Other ethernet
: driver modules are named as 'if_XXX.ko'; why lnc doesn't obey this
: name convension? Typo, or a new name scheme is used instead?

Typo, I think.  The module needs to be named if_XXX.ko for the
automatic kldload in ifconfig to work.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message