Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:10:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <brandon@dvalentine.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/63059: linux-flashplugin LATEST_LINK and RESTRICTED fixes Message-ID: <200402272110.i1RLABmt053473@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/63059; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <brandon@dvalentine.com> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/63059: linux-flashplugin LATEST_LINK and RESTRICTED fixes Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:08:41 -0600 On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 01:31:36AM +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > > Ok, I understand what should be done here. May I make two suggestions: Thanks for reviewing this, Oliver. > - it would be nice to have the link creation in a pkg-install script, > since the autodetection fails if the port is installed from a package The port sets NO_PACKAGE and RESTRICTED. Do I still need to worry about pkg-install time? =) > - a more-or-less short comment what would be removed and why wouldn't be > bad, > (especially because this may remove symlinks not created by the port). > I'm not sure where to place this comments, though. Perhaps the pkg-install > script where the links are created is a good place. I'm not sure where the best place to put this is either. Should I just put a comment in the Makefile or do I need to print a warning to the user at install time? Thanks, Brandon D. Valentine -- brandon@dvalentine.com http://www.geekpunk.net Pseudo-Random Googlism: brandon is een experiment plaats met unieke jurysoftware
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402272110.i1RLABmt053473>