Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 19:20:00 GMT From: "C Hutchinson" <portmaster@bsdforge.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/188127: net/wackamole : deprecate Message-ID: <201405051920.s45JK0fG057556@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/188127; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "C Hutchinson" <portmaster@bsdforge.com> To: =?utf-8?B?UmVuw4PCqSBMYWRhbg==?= <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, portmaster@bsdforge.com Subject: Re: ports/188127: net/wackamole : deprecate Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 12:15:15 -0700 (PDT) > Feel free to have this port resurrected once net/spread is fixed > (fetchable, staged). Note that the maintainer did not reply to this PR > at all. > > René > Hello, René, and thank you for your reply. I think I'm a bit confused. My motivation for addressing ports/188853 (net/spread) was to prevent some 12 ports from being deleted, as they all depended on net/spread. So I added a new reliable MASTER_SITES, and provided STAGE support, and submitted it as ports/188853. Some 2 weeks ago. So as you can see, the patch (diff) I submitted, fixed net/spread 2 weeks ago. But somebody with a commit bit needs to commit it. Are only people with commit bit's allowed to make patches? Apologies. But I just don't understand why all these ports can't be saved, since I've already created a patch(1). Thank you for all your time, and consideration. --Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201405051920.s45JK0fG057556>