Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:44:33 -0400 From: parv <parv_fm@emailgroups.net> To: freebsd-reply@akruijff.dds.nl Cc: Redmond Militante <r-militante@northwestern.edu>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: favorite security software Message-ID: <20021019054433.GA80785@moo.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <18415058332.20021019020210@dds.nl> References: <20021018234041.GA28868@darkpossum> <18415058332.20021019020210@dds.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <18415058332.20021019020210@dds.nl>, wrote Alex thusly... > > I beleave it [ipfilter] also has a bit more options for a normal > firewall but no extra's like ipfw does. The later reason is way i > also run ipfw. I use it for the traffic shaping and traffic policy > only. i have been faithful to ipfilter for about last 2-4 years, mainly due to its stateful inspection. now ipfw does have it too. one thing that's most lustful going for ipfw is the new/improved syntax for specifying ports & such. -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021019054433.GA80785>