Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:44:33 -0400
From:      parv <parv_fm@emailgroups.net>
To:        freebsd-reply@akruijff.dds.nl
Cc:        Redmond Militante <r-militante@northwestern.edu>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: favorite security software
Message-ID:  <20021019054433.GA80785@moo.holy.cow>
In-Reply-To: <18415058332.20021019020210@dds.nl>
References:  <20021018234041.GA28868@darkpossum> <18415058332.20021019020210@dds.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <18415058332.20021019020210@dds.nl>,
wrote Alex thusly...
>
> I beleave it [ipfilter] also has a bit more options for a normal
> firewall but no extra's like ipfw does. The later reason is way i
> also run ipfw. I use it for the traffic shaping and traffic policy
> only.

i have been faithful to ipfilter for about last 2-4 years, mainly
due to its stateful inspection.  now ipfw does have it too.  one
thing that's most lustful going for ipfw is the new/improved syntax
for specifying ports & such.

-- 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021019054433.GA80785>