From nobody Tue Sep 16 23:11:03 2025
X-Original-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cRHhL123Qz67mCB;
	Tue, 16 Sep 2025 23:11:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vermaden@interia.pl)
Received: from smtpo75.interia.pl (smtpo75.interia.pl [217.74.67.75])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cRHhK3q3rz3qSP;
	Tue, 16 Sep 2025 23:11:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vermaden@interia.pl)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 01:11:03 +0200
From: vermaden <vermaden@interia.pl>
Subject: Re: Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default?
To: Sulev-Madis Silber <freebsd-stable-freebsd-org730@ketas.si.pri.ee>,
	"stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: interia.pl/pf09
In-Reply-To: <CAC88F06-7703-4B6F-AF58-287F3BB2E605@ketas.si.pri.ee>
References: <ogyaljbznqjydgfagdst@pama>
	<0100019954a0298d-e00ba983-7e29-427a-a67c-b2bdf11d122e-000000@email.amazonses.com>
	<ceoawzgqmuzaqrcgcppp@ipzi>
	<CAC88F06-7703-4B6F-AF58-287F3BB2E605@ketas.si.pri.ee>
X-Originating-IP: 45.148.42.23
Message-Id: <ucwlajrmyvpxglczgnfg@ugau>
List-Id: Packaging the FreeBSD base system <freebsd-pkgbase.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkgbase
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pkgbase+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-pkgbase+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-pkgbase+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl;
	s=biztos; t=1758064266;
	bh=DQtBsVHyjPZRE4MZZO6hETWsaizi97yuFkaBIkibgCs=;
	h=Date:From:Subject:To:Message-Id:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
	b=QOJj11j3yKXIaYxDWx7b4hL9F4rUNZHJjYI3ERekWb2hS5vzjGu0LpyHfIW4SdLW4
	 XKx6TZJ1a3kXS27S54zOA2je/GWa4h+2+OsYjCO3xLV4vAuk2cgsO9m7iVL3tj9Ei4
	 W+UyCc/yCCV9D64zx/2puhrVpsGb/8O9DtH6y2i8=
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:16138, ipnet:217.74.64.0/22, country:PL]
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4cRHhK3q3rz3qSP


I used this image:

- FreeBSD-15.0-ALPHA2-amd64-20250914-da62a299de31-280122-disc1.iso

Its official 15.0-ALPHA2 'disc1.iso' image.

Regards,
vermaden



Temat: Re: Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default?
Data: 2025-09-17 0:49
Nadawca: "Sulev-Madis Silber" &lt;freebsd-stable-freebsd-org730@ketas.si.pri.ee>
Adresat: stable@freebsd.org; 

> memstick too i hope?
> 
> or any installer which contains pkgbase?
> 
> or perhaps any installer?
> 
> i don't get why this decision was made. you can always upgrade pkg.
> but what if it's truly offline?
> 
> i never understood why pkg is not in base. after all that's like most
> important tool ever. especially now
> 
> yeah, everyone can take src and build whatever installer they want
> but hell with those defaults
> 
> only reason here is that pkg should always be latest and can't in
> some cases be upgraded?
> 
> at least give me reasons i can disagree with!