From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 3 06:36:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA07732 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 06:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shogun.tdktca.com ([206.26.1.21]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA07726 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 06:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shogun.tdktca.com (daemon@localhost) by shogun.tdktca.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) with ESMTP id IAA23553 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 08:37:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from fa.tdktca.com (bsd.fa.tdktca.com [163.49.131.129]) by shogun.tdktca.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) with ESMTP id IAA23547 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 08:37:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from alex@localhost) by fa.tdktca.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id IAA08875; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 08:39:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 08:39:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199607031339.IAA08875@fa.tdktca.com> From: Alex Nash To: dunn@harborcom.net Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: async flag to mount(8) Reply-to: alex@fa.tdktca.com Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Has anyone ever had the stomach to mount a fs async? What have been > your experiences? At the risk of experiencing Terry's wrath :), async is very useful, and under *some* scenarios (like rm -rf), very fast. I think (almost) everyone agrees that it's risky, but for filesystems such as /tmp one really shouldn't care. Alex