From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 22 4:46:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6B137B503 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 04:46:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p57-dn02kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [211.0.245.122]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id VAA08888; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:46:14 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3A95096E.9511A7A5@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:43:26 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Malone Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernfs References: <200102220139.KAA71691@daniel.sobral> <20010222102032.A83571@walton.maths.tcd.ie> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Malone wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:39:47AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > > It seems the error for kernfs is activating a couple of other warnings: > > I think Des retired kernfs in -current in a commit on 2000/12/28. Let me follow up on this. Kernfs is not actually the guilty party, but the problem was _not_ the kernfs warning. The problem, as I saw it, was the two following warnings (ffs and ffs_root). Alas, the ffs warning is correct but happens only once, so it seems that the guilty one was ffs. To be more precise, it seems that when the ffs warning gets activated, the ffs_root warning also gets shown. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.fashionable.bsdconspiracy.net "Too bad sentience isn't a marketable commodity." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message