From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 13 15:12:05 2010
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id A5AD7106567F; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:12:05 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: gahr@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20100713151205.GB95556@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201007131351.o6DDpcmT044616@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20100713144320.GA95556@FreeBSD.org>
	<20100713144735.GK48019@gahrfit.gahr.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100713144735.GK48019@gahrfit.gahr.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/gdcm distinfo
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:12:05 -0000

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> On 2010-Jul-13, 14:43, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:51:38PM +0000, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> > > gahr        2010-07-13 13:51:38 UTC
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     devel/gdcm           distinfo 
> > >   Log:
> > >   - Update distinfo (tarball rerolled)
> > 
> > Per Project's bylaws, explicit acknowledgment of the fact that no
> > malicious changes were introduced in the updated distfiles is required
> > in the commit message.
> 
> Sure, "tarball rerolled" was meant to do just that :)

:-)  Still, it usually doesn't hurt to ask upstream maintainer why
distfile was rerolled and reflect this in commit message, just to be sure.

./danfe