From owner-freebsd-arch  Wed Aug  2 13:53:25 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF0A37C078
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  2 Aug 2000 13:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mjacob@feral.com)
Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70])
	by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA31692;
	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:53:15 -0700
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>
Cc: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Conditionally removing cosmetic messages for small kernels
 (PICOBSD).
In-Reply-To: <20000802222655.A36653@mithrandr.moria.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10008021351470.31711-100000@semuta.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > footprint vs speed etc..) would allow us to tailor PicoBSD to more uses
> > than we're currently able to.
> 
> Oh, I nearly forgot about this.  I sent phk a prototype patch which did
> this whole thing more sensibly for pcisupport.c.  It's attached, is
> slightly old, but gives the general idea on how to do it.
> 
> Feel free to suggest better names for the struct.  The define should
> probably be against PCI_QUIET, not "PICOBSD".
> 

But it's not just PCI cards.

-matt




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message