From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 21 14:19:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA14952 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 14:19:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA14947 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 14:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA23187; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 14:16:45 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199704212116.OAA23187@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: disklabel -- owner? To: rb@gid.co.uk (Bob Bishop) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 14:16:45 -0700 (MST) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Bob Bishop" at Apr 21, 97 08:32:44 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >The magicness of the `c' partition simply solves the chicken-and-egg > >problem for an unlabelled disk. [ ... ] > Don't you also need it for bad144'ing? No, you don't. Not if you do BAD144 "the right way". Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.