From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 18 20:38:07 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5A59C16A4CE; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:38:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id EDE0443D62; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:38:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from iedowse@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa37613@salmon>; 18 Mar 2005 20:38:05 +0000 (GMT)
To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:44:50 +0200."
             <423AB122.6000508@portaone.com> 
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:38:04 +0000
From: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <200503182038.aa37613@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/conf
	GENERIC 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:38:07 -0000

In message <423AB122.6000508@portaone.com>, Maxim Sobolev writes:
>Ian Dowse wrote:
>> In message <423A21E2.4080000@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes:
>> 
>>>In short, all of my "issues" seem to have been fixed! I also just updated my
> 
>>>src tree to try the new code you committed to avoid the detach/reattach 
>>>problem, and that not only works, but it avoids the weird errors I was 
>>>getting about my docking station's USB hub and having to reprobe ums0.
>>>
>>>You and Julian are to be congratulated on all the hard work you've done in 
>>>this area. Good luck with hunting down the rest of the corner cases.
>>>
>>>Doug
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks Doug - that's great news - keep the panic reports and stack
>> traces coming!
>
>Can you commit your re-probing fix, so that it gets wider exposure? It 
>would be nice to have it included into 5.4, since this bug is really 
>anoying and for example prevents us from turning on ehci on production 
>machines that use USB boot devices.

The re-probing fix is committed already - that's what Doug was
referring to above.

Ian