Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 15:41:58 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NatWest? no thanks Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20011102153937.0434b8a0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <15331.5049.557178.962643@guru.mired.org> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011102132958.051040c0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20011101223208.00b3ec20@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20011101190545.03ed6330@localhost> <20011101164226.B47017@jake.akitanet.co.uk> <4.3.2.7.2.20011102132958.051040c0@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:44 PM 11/2/2001, Mike Meyer wrote: >Whether the person in question had bipoloar disorder or an inability >to read the screen is immaterial. Not at all. It is quite important. Also, remember that the ruling in that case claimed that the owner of the site was running a "private club." Clearly, this is not the case for MSN, which is a public accommodation and which Windows users are COMPELLED to access for product activation. So, the ruling was very narrow indeed. And it only applies in one judicial circuit. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20011102153937.0434b8a0>