From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 4 23:36:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813931065670; Tue, 4 May 2010 23:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@jroberson.net) Received: from mail-iw0-f175.google.com (mail-iw0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423678FC0A; Tue, 4 May 2010 23:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn5 with SMTP id 5so5333011iwn.9 for ; Tue, 04 May 2010 16:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.184.9 with SMTP id ci9mr1501143ibb.38.1273016177586; Tue, 04 May 2010 16:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.198] (udp022762uds.hawaiiantel.net [72.234.79.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ha13sm1888695ibb.3.2010.05.04.16.36.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 04 May 2010 16:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 13:36:14 -1000 (HST) From: Jeff Roberson X-X-Sender: jroberson@desktop To: Ed Maste In-Reply-To: <20100504004556.GA59830@sandvine.com> Message-ID: References: <4BDCE05A.5020307@FreeBSD.org> <20100502.073857.74726756.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20100503140438.262539xlm87yp0ao@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100503.151903.74740368.sthaug@nethelp.no> <4BDF5D15.5040207@FreeBSD.org> <20100504004556.GA59830@sandvine.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SUJ update X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 23:36:24 -0000 On Mon, 3 May 2010, Ed Maste wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:32:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > >> I also don't want to bikeshed this to death. I imagine that once the >> feature is stable that users will just twiddle it once and then leave it >> alone, or it will be set at install time and then not twiddled at all. :) > > Speaking of which, is there any reason for us not to support enabling SU+J > at newfs time? (Other than just needing a clean way to share the code > between tunefs and newfs.) The code is actually totally different between the two so it'll essentially have to be rewritten in newfs. tunefs uses libufs and some of the code for manipulating directories that was added to tunefs needs to be moved back into libufs and made more general. However, newfs doesn't use libufs anyway. So it'd have to be converted or you'd just have to re-write journal creation. For now, I think an extra step in the installer is probably easier. Thanks, Jeff > > -Ed > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >