From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 6 15:21:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD67106564A; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 15:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F148FC1B; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 15:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BA1D46B17; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:21:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B7DEB95C; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:21:55 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Nathan Whitehorn Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 07:53:43 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p10; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201202051654.q15GsQcc092137@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201202051654.q15GsQcc092137@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202060753.43627.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:21:55 -0500 (EST) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r231026 - head/sys/powerpc/ofw X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:21:56 -0000 On Sunday, February 05, 2012 11:54:26 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > Author: nwhitehorn > Date: Sun Feb 5 16:54:26 2012 > New Revision: 231026 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/231026 > > Log: > Make sure to remap adjusted resources. Hmm, I had considered remapping adjusted resources an invalid operation (i.e. should fail with EINVAL). I believe that the NEW_PCIB code should only apply this API to resources backing the resource windows in PCI-PCI bridges and that those resources should never have RF_ACTIVE set. Are you seeing calls of it for active resources? -- John Baldwin