From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 13 07:25:27 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA15672 for current-outgoing; Thu, 13 Apr 1995 07:25:27 -0700 Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA15666 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 1995 07:25:21 -0700 Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; id AA08662; Thu, 13 Apr 1995 10:25:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 1995 10:25:16 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <9504131425.AA08662@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: Missing telent login prompt In-Reply-To: <9504122129.AA19093@cs.weber.edu> References: <9504121431.AA06937@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <9504122129.AA19093@cs.weber.edu> Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk <> > No. What happened is that 2.0 is running entirely different code. The >> > telnet in 2.0 is the new stuff from Cray. >> >> ``the new stuff from Cray'' is a direct descendant of all previous BSD >> telnet programs, and was developed specifically for 4.4BSD. > So you are saying that, as a direct descendent, the finite state > automaton that allows the remote end to determine 4.2-ness vs. > 4.3-ness wasn't broken No, I'm correcting your assertion that the 4.4 telnet programs are ``entirely different code''. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant