From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 23 23:28:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gilliam.users.flyingcroc.net (gilliam.users.flyingcroc.net [207.246.128.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7474E15868 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:28:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ross@gilliam.users.flyingcroc.net) Received: (from ross@localhost) by gilliam.users.flyingcroc.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA04661; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 11:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908240628.XAA04661@gilliam.users.flyingcroc.net> To: "Matt Crawford" Cc: "Pleschutznig, Andreas" , "'Leif Neland'" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Teergrubes [was Re: Dropping connections without RST] From: Joel Ray Holveck Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > process normally if the HELO and MAIL From/RCPT To look all right; > otherwise continue to read small gulps of the DATA at slow intervals, > then answer the final "." with a *temporary* failure code. I'd rather have spammers consume less of my CPU time and bandwidth, not have them keep coming back again and again. I suppose if you've got the computrons to waste, then it's okay. joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message