From owner-freebsd-mips@freebsd.org  Mon Oct 26 17:49:11 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mips@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FB3813F
 for <freebsd-mips@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:49:11 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6230C1E50
 for <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:49:11 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: by igbdj2 with SMTP id dj2so61622043igb.1
 for <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=QuIy5PB3Xnlan/HSkuWzHEalIMhhAg+v8wmnkF9MSIQ=;
 b=N76z46aLIyyEVVvmrFerqn0qOS45ssW4brrA56uLDZL85DmEnuD1p6b1+e26IcY8jr
 +PAtmASdymGTQWGi5ggd5+pcjHdl4kABug1KEvV0vnKiJkMXZPj3FXD+xSa6rvqJQEdf
 5C1nXuxxE6ZE6TrNUKilSbBfkPeLXW7FkwMgdmxs3LC82YvsIN8HlXg8EowJ39k8lc3V
 0XiJOqyZo0yWAKrRbYtUqrFLqPCrNjo8RRUxQcGQPrG3B8uZPqFIWe79GwO3Am4xIaad
 lfWHt/V01in1w36xYCyiDNZU3xKwWpYEUqGwNH4ihffp3TwJgQMFDbwiLaEgGDtvBcXc
 q8Lg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.111.226 with SMTP id il2mr18985972igb.61.1445881750655;
 Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.46.66 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <562E5D17.7030700@rdtc.ru>
References: <562E44E9.8090605@grosbein.net>
	<562E5D17.7030700@rdtc.ru>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:49:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokyYVPmsY9BU=tRV6zYWweqsECwmYexv_mMpbFob+yjRw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Strange results of TP-Link WDR3600 wired ethernet performace test
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
To: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru>
Cc: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS <freebsd-mips.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-mips>,
 <mailto:freebsd-mips-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mips/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-mips@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-mips-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mips>,
 <mailto:freebsd-mips-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:49:11 -0000

Hi,

I'm glad that the throughput is higher - I was expecting exactly that.

The interrupt storm - not sure. I haven't reproduced that at home.
There's some bit(s) in the interrupt status register that don't seem
to be cleared by taking action. I don't know what they are yet.

We don't yet have hardware NAT acceleration in our stack. Someone has
to write it. :-)




-adrian