From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 23 23:51:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA19189 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 23:51:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from isbalham.ist.co.uk (isbalham.ist.co.uk [192.31.26.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA19184 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 23:50:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from gid.co.uk (uucp@localhost) by isbalham.ist.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with UUCP id HAA23949; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 07:50:49 GMT (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from localhost by seagoon.gid.co.uk; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 07:41:43 GMT Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 07:41:43 +0000 (GMT) From: Bob Bishop X-Sender: rb@seagoon To: Matthew Dillon cc: Luoqi Chen , cnielsen@pobox.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel threads In-Reply-To: <199811240433.UAA12209@apollo.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Mon, 23 Nov 1998, Matthew Dillon wrote: > What we really need to do is integrate the VFS layer abstraction into > the buffer cache and get rid of all the baggage in the buffer pointer > (bp) layer. [etc] What does this do to the minimum kernel footprint (think picobsd etc)? -- Bob Bishop +44 118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 118 989 4254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message