Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 12:17:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "David E. Cross" <dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu> To: Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net> Cc: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SIGDANGER Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980428121410.15319C-100000@phoenix.its.rpi.edu> In-Reply-To: <19980428073841.05698@mcs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Karl Denninger wrote: > Well, now wait a minute.. > > SIGDANGER is useful if properly trapped and handled. I'd like to see if > supported with the default to be "ignore" (ie: you have to ASK for it to > be delivered and processed). May I ask what good is it if it is ignored by default???? Default should be as it is on AIX, to terminate the process. In general you care more about system processes than user procs, so I would "make world" on my system if this got added, with all the system procs having a one line addition in main() to ignore the signal, and I would be ready to go. -- David Cross To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980428121410.15319C-100000>