From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Jul 25 20:20: 7 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B7937B403
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f6Q3K2686196;
	Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200107260320.f6Q3K2686196@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: misc/14895: portmap bug (when run with -v flag)
Reply-To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR misc/14895; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
To: David Lowe <dlowe@pootpoot.com>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: misc/14895: portmap bug (when run with -v flag)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 23:35:31 -0400

 On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 05:45:40PM -0700, David Lowe wrote:
 > Mike -
 > 
 > I really don't have any machines more recent than 4.2-RELEASE to play with
 > at the moment.  It's very predictable and easy to duplicate, if you have
 > access to such a machine.
 > 
 > I am building a new machine within the next month or so, so I will test it
 > again once it's done if you are unable to do so.
 > 
 > misc/12607 doesn't mention (in the fix) whether they explicitly ran
 > portmap with the -v flag in testing, nor does it explain *why* the bug
 > would go away under post-4.2.  So I suspect that it's just that nobody has
 > tried it, but would be happy to be proven wrong.
 
 I don't have a 4.3-RELEASE or 4.3-STABLE box available for testing
 this, and 5.0-CURRENT seems to be using a new mechanism for RPC which
 doesn't exhibit this behaviour.
 
 Best regards,
 Mike Barcroft

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message