From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 14 18:11:06 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEEFB81;
 Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:11:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13E552BD5;
 Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:11:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p58so7978145wes.40
 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=uyGC07M3iApI6iriGIStoAJTeTXtdv882n3NxtBCLek=;
 b=YXjn5n6nr9mPFSWMeSFdL/6ks5yNfT81kzwif/6B1clBGA7ABq2isyHZKU81GioPK4
 ncz4bgG+pFcHn/Y3+mmk2FRcKSLmVSgUwYM7zqfDKEZ10pnlQQNr92z2mMpL80IhxIe1
 rw1d+YIsf+x+Ciw9toeQiDHRrK3QwkJ/5HKvDxcenHtg9U+6qIKrxFNjQuWS8zMiY9zG
 x5q2lzWAxpmkVeS6vDZzcm2QrwuYY7i8ncslC35v/Fqm/XShs1ca6QHeKzXsz/Z1qap0
 DWj+mV7CU1/OYJXpzHejCaNl85o2oL4Li4/m1JttRBtKK6S1I56aTKv7+B1AkYbF3DUf
 U9Rw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.37.164 with SMTP id z4mr2939953wij.30.1376503864231;
 Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.217.116.136 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <587579055.20130814154713@serebryakov.spb.ru>
References: <520A6D07.5080106@freebsd.org> <520AFBE8.1090109@freebsd.org>
 <520B24A0.4000706@freebsd.org> <520B3056.1000804@freebsd.org>
 <20130814102109.GA63246@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
 <587579055.20130814154713@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:11:04 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: glOPNvNm3PXuhuqP9xyJaiSR_uk
Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokxgWKeuPFGEE-wzLcYpyt3Ua90JZH2BBTj39LoTSUsMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux)
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>,
 FreeBSD Net <net@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:11:06 -0000

On 14 August 2013 04:47, Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org> wrote:


>   And we should invalidate this info on ARP/route changes, or connection
>  will be lost in such cases, am I right?.. So, on each such event code
>  should look into all sockets and check, if routing/ARP information is
> still
>  valid for them. Or we should store lists of sockets in routing and ARP
>  tables... I don't know, what is worse.
>

.. or per-CPU copies of the ARP table.. ?



-adrian