From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 25 09:15:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F317A677; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:15:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FFA8FC14; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B6D3B783; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9P9FS8b003498; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:15:28 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: geom access method and g_topology_lock In-reply-to: <50890251.8090402@FreeBSD.org> From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: <5088E0E0.2080307@FreeBSD.org> <28185.1351150111@critter.freebsd.dk> <5088FA15.30205@FreeBSD.org> <70960.1351154478@critter.freebsd.dk> <5088FE30.2030903@FreeBSD.org> <94629.1351155886@critter.freebsd.dk> <50890251.8090402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:15:28 +0000 Message-ID: <3497.1351156528@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:15:30 -0000 -------- In message <50890251.8090402@FreeBSD.org>, Andriy Gapon writes: >Now need to think hard how to avoid doing that nasty thing... Nothing prevents a GEOM from having multiple consumers attached to the same provider. That opens a lot of interesting options. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.