From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Feb 16 09:01:39 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id JAA01391 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 09:01:39 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA01385 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 09:01:37 -0800 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id JAA01249; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 09:01:26 -0800 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199502161701.JAA01249@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: DHCP patches for bootpd To: dfr@render.com (Doug Rabson) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 09:01:25 -0800 (PST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Doug Rabson" at Feb 16, 95 02:34:04 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 753 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I have a locally patched bootpd here which will respond to DHCP requests > with ip addresses from its statically allocated tables. It does not work > with WFW3.11 due to problems with broadcast replies but it does work with > current betas of Win95. Should I commit this thing or wait for > bootpd-2.5 which will have essentially the same DHCP support and might > also support dynamic allocation? I suggest you make a README and stick it all in the tarfile, then it will be in the "experimental" directory on the CD. Anybody else with this kind of "non-finished" code lying around, do the same thing! -- Poul-Henning Kamp TRW Financial Systems, Inc. I am Pentium Of Borg. Division is Futile. You WILL be approximated.