From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 14:34:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CF6106566B for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01F38FC1A for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF2BE6B25; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:34:20 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=s8YJgnSdVm8Z 5BTETEOp88RDvsg=; b=hB1l/Zay9v+SzWAhIMUv0WjzTYEozZJTTm6c7UOxT7ta KrFSpj/tLmnfC0aXNtoq73aVhL1vuQj0I01785UCZl4xKLBwjpFPP1zJKK7onZLJ /f1y26uKNfW9AEzi7srohK0EWc7/KTbWCPCJvRX2lz0+wHzubItAnmURfkUmUJY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=tGn7/W LRNb3TZgFCoBeuBobGLznMbbBbOxg6MHjshMDzzPG53LnbdZXHuxu/aI6C7Kss+P j8mY8QNhNUCMUiao5ctzdpQXhQSPa5jGLkpHG1nZXpfLSW/dX9up/XQ66jREVbmS WOhJ4Pvc68wX48AuNKgSiXHRjhu9wFO/hGYmU= Received: from [192.168.1.104] (188-222-18-231.zone13.bethere.co.uk [188.222.18.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75205E6307; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:34:20 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E5CF4EA.2070804@cran.org.uk> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:34:18 +0100 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mihamina Rakotomandimby References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> <4E5CAD9E.6050903@rktmb.org> <4E5CB49F.50806@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5CBC14.4080908@rktmb.org> <4E5CF1ED.2030504@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5CF417.5080503@rktmb.org> In-Reply-To: <4E5CF417.5080503@rktmb.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd Current , "Hartmann, O." Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:34:22 -0000 On 30/08/2011 15:30, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > For a _comparison_, I think it's up to somewhere else: > To really compare, it's mandatory to really now the multiple compared > items. Who cares about the latest MS Windows internals (deep > networking capability, filesystem tricks, kernel scheduler specs,...) > in here? > > I migh be wrong, but IMHO "core devs" and "power users" wont spend > time to deeply investigate on the other systems. You're wrong :) I write Windows drivers for a living, so I care about that stuff. -- Bruce Cran