From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 14 14:58:54 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: jail@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261EB856;
 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:58:54 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jamie@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from m2.gritton.org (gritton.org [199.192.164.235])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED98698D;
 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:58:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from glorfindel.gritton.org (c-174-52-130-157.hsd1.ut.comcast.net
 [174.52.130.157]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by m2.gritton.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1EEwqeL094374;
 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:58:53 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from jamie@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <511CFBAC.3000803@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:58:52 -0700
From: Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/3.1.16
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Marking some FS as jailable
References: <20130212194047.GE12760@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
 <511B1F55.3080500@FreeBSD.org> <20130214132715.GG44004@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
 <511CF77A.2080005@FreeBSD.org> <20130214145600.GI44004@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130214145600.GI44004@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: jail@FreeBSD.org, fs@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:58:54 -0000

On 02/14/13 07:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:40:58AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
>> On 02/14/13 06:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:06:29PM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
>>>> On 02/12/13 12:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to mark some filesystem as jailable, here is the one I need:
>>>>> linprocfs, tmpfs and fdescfs, I was planning to do it with adding a
>>>>> allow.mount.${fs} for each one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone has an objection?
>>>>
>>>> Would it make sense for linprocfs to use the existing allow.mount.procfs
>>>> flag?
>>>
>>> Here is a patch that uses allow.mount.procfs for linsysfs and linprocfs.
>>>
>>> It also addd a new allow.mount.tmpfs to allow tmpfs.
>>>
>>> It seems to work here, can anyone confirm this is the right way to do it?
>>>
>>> I'll commit in 2 parts: first lin*fs, second tmpfs related things
>>>
>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/jail-fs.diff
>>
>> There are some problems. The usage on the mount side of things looks
>> correct, but it needs more on the jail side. I'm including a patch just
>> of that part, with a correction in jail.h and further changes in kern_jail.c
>
> Thank you the patch has been updated with your fixes.

One more bit (literally): PR_ALLOW_ALL in sys/jail.h needs updating.

- Jamie