Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 21:07:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217771] lang/beignet: update to 1.3.1 Message-ID: <bug-217771-7141-6pgZeM88H9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-217771-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-217771-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217771 --- Comment #14 from Matthew Rezny <rezny@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #13) MFH is for security updates and bug fixes. The former does not apply. Does = the latter? The email you sent just minutes prior suggested that the issue from PR 2176= 35 is still present and that enabling OpenCL 2.0 was premature. That email and this last question seem to be in direct opposition. So which is it, did the 1.3.1 update resolve bugs and thus should be MFHed because it has low-risk, or does the 1.3.1 update still contain bugs and present a risk with a possibly premature feature? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-217771-7141-6pgZeM88H9>