From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 6 16:40:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F308C16A41F for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:40:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D565143D66 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:39:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668C0B814 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:39:58 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: References: <20051206063134.GA57230@sysadm.stc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vivek Khera Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:39:57 -0500 To: freebsd-stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Subject: Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:40:05 -0000 On Dec 6, 2005, at 7:37 AM, Joshua Coombs wrote: > Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to > eliminate that issue. So you were not truthful about running a 386... > What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets > are considered stable or not. Works for me[tm].