From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 19:22:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1F3BBE for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 19:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9C2B2A96 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 19:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s71JMe6X053542 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 19:22:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191713] [new port] net/p5-Net-RabbitFoot - Synchronous interface to AnyEvent::RabbitMQ Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 19:22:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bill.brinzer@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 19:22:41 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191713 --- Comment #6 from bill.brinzer@gmail.com --- I really did run "poudriere testport", but since I'm just learning poudriere, I'm sure the missing tests are due to some kind of operator error on my part. Is it possible that I attached the wrong log file? In any case, I will re-run with "poudriere bulk -t" and post the results here. Thanks for your patience! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.