From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 12 11:11:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA13957 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 11:11:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA13909 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 11:10:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1) id 0xrp1P-0002P0-00; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 10:55:39 -0800 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 10:55:39 -0800 (PST) From: Tom cc: dmaddox@scsn.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 16650 Support(?) In-Reply-To: <19980112183453.53078@deepo.prosa.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Philippe Regnauld wrote: > Donald J. Maddox writes: > > > > The AT command to use both B channels is 'AT@B0=2' on the BitSURFR; however, > > it has 3 different rate adaption protocols: V.120, AIMux, and PPP. If I > > use V.120, everything works great, but, unfortunately, V.120 does not support > > channel bonding. > > Err.. I do 2x64 bundling everyday from home to the office on ZyXEL TAs using > V.120 (between pppd and iijppp). Except that V120 results in really bad performance. Some TAs can't make bonded V120 calls. No big deal, because V120 is terrible for PPP anyhow. > -- > -[ Philippe Regnauld / sysadmin / regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk / +55.4N +11.3E ]- > "Pluto placed his bad dog at the entrance of Hades to keep the dead IN and > the living OUT! The archetypical corporate firewall?" > - S. Kelly Bootle, about Cerberus ["MYTHOLOGY", in Marutukku distrib] - > > Tom