From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 13 03:49:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87C21065679; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (hergotha.csail.mit.edu [66.92.79.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678168FC16; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5D3BDg5063746; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:11:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m5D3BD5m063745; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:11:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:11:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200806130311.m5D3BD5m063745@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> To: brooks@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080613025157.GA90190@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <4851CC95.8070902@psg.com> <4851CD9D.3010801@isc.org> Organization: None X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (hergotha.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:11:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on hergotha.csail.mit.edu Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssh window X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:49:43 -0000 In article <20080613025157.GA90190@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>, Brooks Davis writes: >On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:30:05PM -0700, Peter Losher wrote: >> FYI - HPN is already a build option in the openssh-portable port. > >I do think we should strongly consider adding the rest of it to the base. Am I the only one who would be happier if openssh were not in the base system at all? I always have to install the port anyway; having it in the base just gives me more files I need to delete after an install. (Heimdal is the other big culprit.) -GAWollman