From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 17 12:53:26 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA10540 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 12:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.177]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA10535; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 12:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA00378; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 20:25:12 +0200 (MET DST) To: Christoph Kukulies cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: in.h: direct-broadcast valid oid? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 17 Sep 1996 19:46:06 +0200." <199609171746.TAA00763@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 20:25:11 +0200 Message-ID: <376.842984711@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199609171746.TAA00763@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>, Christoph Ku kulies writes: > >Just wondering if - signs in oid names are valid? > >Shouldn't these be _scores? > > { "directed-broadcast", CTLTYPE_INT }, \ > { "intr-queue-maxlen", CTLTYPE_INT }, \ > { "intr-queue-drops", CTLTYPE_INT }, \ > It's a little inconsistent on this point, but in general new names should be legal 'C' symbols. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.