From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 15 15:34:39 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4D316A41F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:34:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from lists@webtent.net)
Received: from columbus.webtent.org
	(static-70-110-70-42.tampfl.fios.verizon.net [70.110.70.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E527343D62
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:34:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from lists@webtent.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by columbus.webtent.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28FACFAC9;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:34:35 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert Fitzpatrick <lists@webtent.net>
To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:34:35 -0500
Message-Id: <1134660875.477.45.camel@columbus.webtent.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stone@tainet.lt
Subject: amavis-stats 0.19
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@webtent.com
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:34:39 -0000

Looks like the port for amavis-stats 0.12 doesn't work, my error posting
to the amavis lists came back saying get 0.19, entirely rewritten.

Will this be updated soon or should I proceed to isntall from source?

--
Robert