From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 12 17:33:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6CF1065673 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C11A8FC14 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so315873gyf.13 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:33:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IkHw/4d3a2kLmFvw3zE7OdWiXLcTNSOkJN1VjEJC6MQ=; b=T4DjMQJkj0wY0o22g+yFrGjoE0FQVpaLr9ptqduFqdKlZMr9c8OHJuIcGCHhMxkGa5 7ublJ1tY4FmSUb900ih/ooZ1V4vZ2kQTB4ZM9zHB3QLhLrKPSK50aut08VQQLo3ji9cE +d+61uvev7fa0DzMkXGmIptVETcryC1mB+mUE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=xJkbTruhZmwTeBU0uHzLwnWmU90K4i8ZtLUcsN/PjsUn4+I4mV1nYjHEq3pToQRZfI zyy303ADQNPWZkYTrovviE+unQ6rxkdnuWKpGKSDjW3mEmE66YvPRbwwPozT13nN+FMT FLw/YXOjRFw6mfMg055bdIqTJI8VJP6gu6s9I= Received: by 10.90.63.6 with SMTP id l6mr1932159aga.125.1294853600486; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:33:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([174.35.1.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x36sm1063910anx.34.2011.01.12.09.33.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:33:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:32:42 -0800 From: Pyun YongHyeon Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:32:42 -0800 To: Lev Serebryakov Message-ID: <20110112173242.GA12920@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <1512738982.20110111124729@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111200007.GC6278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <149076940.20110112003110@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111224526.GD6278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <751614742.20110112120303@serebryakov.spb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <751614742.20110112120303@serebryakov.spb.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to 100Mbit and re NICs on MSI MoBo: problems with duplex negotiation (Hetzner host provider discard FreeBSD support due this bug) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:33:21 -0000 On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:03:03PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Pyun. > You wrote 12 января 2011 г., 1:45:26: > > > > That had been supported for long time. Just remove full-duplex > > media option in your manual configuration. > What do you mean by this? Without this media options it will be > 100Mbit half-duplex when switch port want 100Mbit full-duplex. With Because you have to rely on parallel detection the end result would be half-duplex. So switch port could be configured to 100Mbps/half-duplex and you can still use auto-negotiation. This way re(4) may be able to establish 100Mbps half-duplex. Full-duplex would be better but it seems there is no way at this moment. > this media option result is the same because refphy(4) ignores user > requests, if I understand right. > > -- > // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov >