From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 11:47:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BBF16A504 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F37143FF5 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:47:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([12.233.125.100]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2003090818474601300k7lioe>; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:47:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA34951; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:47:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Vincent Jardin In-Reply-To: <200309051833.37440.vjardin@free.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Konstantin KABASSANOV cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adding a teredo node into netgraph X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 18:47:48 -0000 On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Vincent Jardin wrote: > Hi, > > > > contact me.. > > > > what is teredo? > > I have been working with Konstantin about it. > It is an IPv6 over UDP/IPv4 migration service. It is supported by Windows XP + > SP1 + Microsoft update. It can be used in order to cross some NATs. > > see > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-00.txt > > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/Teredo.asp > > > Regards, > Vincent > I can imagine this would be quite easy.. I already use mpd across udp packets to implement vpns. assuming that teh ksocket node does ipv6 stuff correctly (I've never tested it) it would seem a "natural" for netgraph. to do this..)