From owner-freebsd-fs Thu Mar 5 12:45:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA17466 for freebsd-fs-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 12:45:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA17441 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 12:45:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA00428; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 21:39:57 +0100 (CET) To: Nate Williams cc: Eivind Eklund , fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr: bi-endian ffs available] In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Mar 1998 10:58:40 MST." <199803051758.KAA19486@mt.sri.com> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 21:39:57 +0100 Message-ID: <426.889130397@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199803051758.KAA19486@mt.sri.com>, Nate Williams writes: >> Should we adopt this? > >> From: Manuel Bouyer >... >> I've made big progress in getting ffs read both big and little endian >> file systems. A preliminary (but working :) version is available >> at ftp.netbsd.org:/pub/incoming/bouyer/ffs_endian.diff.gz. > >Not if performance matters to you, which it does to me. Well, we can make it "OEFFS" for "Omni-Endian-FFS", I can see the point of having it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message