Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:58:58 -0600 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: request for enhancment: portupgrade Message-ID: <20011210125858.A92148@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <86vgff4dde.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>; from knu@iDaemons.org on Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 06:45:49PM %2B0900 References: <20011210030804.Y92148@elvis.mu.org> <86vgff4dde.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org> [011210 03:45] wrote:
> At Mon, 10 Dec 2001 03:08:04 -0600,
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > when doing portupgrade one doesn't see which port is actually being
> > built, this is epecially odd when doing portupgrade -a.
>
> Answer 1: Specify -v/--verbose from each command line, in the
> PORTUPGRADE environment variable, or in your own pkgtools.conf.
>
> Answer 2: Maybe I should make portupgrade more verbose even if -v
> isn't given. Let me think about it.
I think #2 is good, i mean, without -v i see something like..
no need to upgrade foo-1.2.3
no need to upgrade bar-4.1
no need to upgrade baz-6.3.2
Cleaning aaa
The cleaning of 'aaa' isn't for baz, what is it for? :)
> > portupgrade blocks ^Z (suspend) or at least seems to.
>
> Yes, this is a known issue. Do you know if or how I can keep
> script(1) from blocking SUSP? I haven't figured it out yet..
Can you point me at where and why script(1) is run?
I may be able to assist.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011210125858.A92148>