From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Dec 12 1:13:45 2000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 01:13:43 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.salford.ac.uk (pan.salford.ac.uk [146.87.255.104]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D27C337B400 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 01:13:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 92195 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2000 09:05:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 92189 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2000 09:05:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO plato.salford.ac.uk) (146.87.255.76) by pan.salford.ac.uk with SMTP; 12 Dec 2000 09:05:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 37865 invoked by uid 141); 12 Dec 2000 09:05:47 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Dec 2000 09:05:47 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:05:47 +0000 (GMT) From: Mark Powell To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About GCC 2.95.2 -O2 bug Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <913bgg$j34$1@mimas.salford.ac.uk>, Kenneth Mays wrote: >Hey, > >I remember seeing something in the GCC snapshots that the optimization bug >was fixed. You should test with GCC 2.95.2 with a clean environment and >document exactly your setup and procedures for testing the bug. It was a clean environment. I would provide some help in finding the bug. However, I don't know where the CRC is ever generated in the src and my x86 assembler isn't great either. Done little assembler since my 68000 days :( Cheers. Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford Academic Information Services, Clifford Whitworth Building, Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 5936 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message