From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 22 11:19:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA06060 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 11:19:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from assurance.rstcorp.com (assurance.rstcorp.com [206.29.49.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA06036 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 11:19:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vshah@rstcorp.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by assurance.rstcorp.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA20970; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:17:49 -0500 Received: from sandbox.rstcorp.com(206.29.49.63) by assurance.rstcorp.com via smap (V2.0) id xma020964; Tue, 22 Dec 98 14:17:17 -0500 Received: from jabberwock.rstcorp.com (jabberwock [206.29.49.98]) by sandbox.rstcorp.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA10562; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:17:16 -0500 (EST) Received: (from vshah@localhost) by jabberwock.rstcorp.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) id OAA99020; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:17:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:17:17 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199812221917.OAA99020@jabberwock.rstcorp.com> From: "Viren R. Shah" To: Bruce Evans Cc: crossd@cs.rpi.edu, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: re: error: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 In-Reply-To: <199812221755.EAA04557@godzilla.zeta.org.au> References: <199812221755.EAA04557@godzilla.zeta.org.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: "Viren R. Shah" X-Face: )~y+U*K:yzjz{q<5lzpI_SVef'U.])9g[C9`1N@]u3,MHY7f*l7C)[_NjM4y4K8$uIUh|\u (K&&HS6,M!61&GMTk'mqmB/Qg]]X}"?TzsFl]"2v!bl8']dma.:^IY^a[lbOI>U:b<~FyK3q-p{HmZ mn~g.`~BE!5{2D:}Yi+\_KkWe?XaHj9$ko1k8iKLYv5*_2c8"G=?Up[}hn+7RNM(bzBZ_wWk6!Pf&B ?3Tcm7M7B~W%K/I0aX3]*=jP?aM]H6HBPT`oLk+0n^_;N\2\%|Rhy;p}34Q.jEsM\qtnxcm;ag%Nq Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "BDE" == Bruce Evans writes: >>>>> "DEC" == "David E. Cross" writes: DEC> The remedy is to find what IRQ it is really using. When I had DEC> this problem I swore I knew what IRQ the UART was using, and DEC> that FreeBSD was wrong, after reviewing the code, and changing DEC> the IRQ (from 4 to 3 in this case), it worked fine. BDE> It checks all IRQs without trapping, but the check (and normal operation) BDE> may be broken by almost any device physically bound to the same irq, BDE> independently of the probe order (exception: sio devices on the same BDE> irq but not yet probed are specially handled so that they don't interfere BDE> with previous probes). I'll check (as soon as I get home) whether there is anything else using irq 5. If not, I'll try changing things around (which will be fun, since this is an old EISA machine). Thanks guys Viren -- Viren Shah | "No amount of source-level verification Research Associate, RST Inc. | or scrutiny will protect you from using viren@rstcorp.com | untrusted code." http://www.rstcorp.com/~vshah | - Ken Thompson "Reflections on Trusting Trust" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message