From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 17 07:56:45 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B02106564A;
	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:56:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz)
Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB1F8FC19;
	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:56:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105E567CA92;
	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:56:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz
Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id CLZ2DmomFPQd; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:56:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CD267C952;
	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:56:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from rdivacky@localhost)
	by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m3H7uJvs063440;
	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:56:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:56:19 +0200
From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org>
To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20080417075619.GA62998@freebsd.org>
References: <200804161256.56633.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<11167f520804161438q1f92000dsd57c5409350dedb9@mail.gmail.com>
	<200804161818.35543.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<200804161839.52682.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200804161839.52682.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add stubs for Linux 2.6.17 syscalls
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:56:45 -0000

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 06:39:48PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 April 2008 06:18 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 April 2008 05:38 pm, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> > > would a patch like this make linux flash9 work?
> >
> > I wasn't able to make linux-flashplugin9 work with amd64 but I know
> > set_robust_list syscall was used by linux_base-f8 +
> > nspluginwrapper. Can anyone try it on i386 and let us know?
> 
> BTW, functionally it does not change anything but it complains 
> unimplemeted syscalls are used, i.e., just making them visible.  With 
> or without it, it should return ENOSYS.

I wonder what would change if we used "vanilla glibc" instead of fedora's
one....

can someone test flash9 with "normal glibc" ie, not one that with 2.6.16
kernel uses 2.6.37 syscalls ;)

roman