Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Feb 2004 17:53:28 -0600 (CST)
From:      "Paul Seniura" <pdseniura@techie.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Paul Seniura <pdseniura@techie.com>
Subject:   trap 9 with ULE also, but it did boot up all the way
Message-ID:  <20040202235328.D09185C1E@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us>
In-Reply-To: <20040202181010.GA89730@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References:  <20040128171448.D9EA85C34@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <20040130210112.9EE7A5C34@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <20040130221450.GA69755@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20040202162423.0752E5C36@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

ULE booted up all the way this time (first time!), albeit with the repeating ata1-slave lines.
I could use the system for about 5 minutes before the trap 9 sprung.
System was lightly-loaded as in my earlier msg on 4BSD (running links on a vt).
It hit on the same instruction, slightly different addrs of course.
"Stopped at      atpic_handle_intr+0x4d: cmpl    $0,0x4(%edi)"
Both of these kernels were built with today's CTM bucket; I will test tomorrow's bucket then.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040202235328.D09185C1E>